The Conscription Society

Administered Mass Organizations

Gregory J. Kasza

View Inside Price: $65.00


August 30, 1995
232 pages, 6 1/8 x 9 1/4
ISBN: 9780300062427
Cloth

The ability to organize millions of people for political purposes is a potent and relatively recent weapon in the struggle for power. Political scientists have studied two types of mass organization, the political party and the interest group. In this book Gregory Kasza examines a third type, which he calls the administered mass organization. AMOs are mass civilian bodies created by authoritarian regimes to implement public policy. Officials use them to organize youths, workers, women, or members of other social sectors into bodies resembling the mass conscript army. A network of AMOs produces a conscription society, a major force in twentieth-century politics in over 45 countries.

Using comparative history and organization theory, Kasza analyzes the politics of the conscription society in both military and single-party regimes. He discusses the origins of AMOs in Japan, the Soviet Union, and Fascist Italy and their subsequent spread to China, Egypt, Nazi Germany, Peru, Poland, and Yugoslavia. He focuses on the use of AMOs to curb political opposition, to mobilize for war, and to shift control over the means of production. Kasza shows how, in the hands of despotic rulers, AMOs have contributed to the extremes of political barbarism characteristic of the twentieth century.

Gregory J. Kasza is associate professor of political science and East Asian languages and cultures at Indiana University. 

"The book is a significant contribution, a highly persuasive argument for the commonality of the administered mass organization in the twentieth century. Kasza's achievement in isolating and identifying this organizational form is original, and his comparative perspective is especially valuable."—Thomas Remington, Emory University

"Kasza challenges many fundamental assumptions about how political and social organizations have functioned in this most brutal of centuries. The Conscription Society is a highly ambitious and ultimately successful attempt to bring social science into the post-Cold War period by comparing and contrasting social organizations in a variety of single-party regimes."—Blair A. Ruble, director, Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies

"Students of modern authoritarianism are greatly in Kasza's debt. His original study of administered mass organizations identifies, maps, dissects, and analyzes a crucial political species in its many habitats. A powerful concept examined in great breadth."—James C. Scott, Yale University

"The Conscription Society is an impressive book not only because of its rigorous comparative dimension/framework, but also because it makes three important interpretive points. Kasza emphasizes the centrality of war in modern society, demonstrates the importance of administered mass organizations in preparing for war, and, by analyzing the role of administered mass organizations in despotic rule, shows why some authoritarian and totalitarian regimes were more successful than others."—Richard J. Smethurst, professor of Japanese history, University of Pittsburgh

"Kasza's book provides an important angle to explain the rise and the persistence of authoritarian regimes in the 20th century. The main contribution of this book is the development of a conceptual construct of the AMO as an identifiable and particular organizational form in political analysis. . . . I am impressed by the author's command of a strong comparative perspective and his knowledge about a wide range of social and historical contexts."—Xueguang Zhou, American Journal of Sociology

"This well-written book effectively combines empirical and normative analyses to provide insight into an area of significance often neglected by comparativists in the past. Highly recommended for all collections on political organization, political development, and military affairs."—Choice

"This thought-provoking book should be read by students of Japanese history and comparative politics alike. It shifts the focus from voluntary groups and political parties to the illiberal, managed modes of 'participation,' which form a major part of public life in twentieth-century Japan and other societies."—Sheldon Garon, Journal of Japanese Studies

Winner of the 1996 Outstanding Academic Book Award given by Choice Magazine